Monday 16 March 2009

England's Twenty20 confusion

England have a habit of turning up at major tournaments in a state of confusion. Every World Cup campaign since 1992 has been mired in poor planning and it is fair to say the team and tactics are far from settled with the ICC World Twenty20 on the horizon.

Sunday’s heavy defeat by West Indies brought back memories of November’s Stanford debacle. Once again an efficient performance from the home side highlighted the deficiencies of an England cricket team that does not know its best starting eleven and is incapable of doing the basics right.

The omission of the in-form Matt Prior was strange and the sight of England’s captain scratching around for runs at number six was one that came as no surprise; Andrew Strauss’ new-found positivity at the crease might well be transferred from Tests to One Day internationals – Twenty20 cricket might be a step too far.

This is just one selectorial headache. The openers continue to rotate with such regularity that the construction of a partnership is impossible – the throwing in of Steve Davies with the tournament imminent is systematic of England’s muddled thinking.

The subject of specialists is always relevant and England have veered from one extreme to the other - Jeremy Snape and Darren Maddy were called-up for the ill-fated 2007 World Twenty20 campaign, but the Stanford squad was dominated by familiar faces in a crude attempt at continuity.

It is surely too late for the likes of Joe Denly and Graham Napier to receive call-ups, so the team that was hammered by West Indies can be assumed to form the basis of the likely starters, with the addition of Andrew Flintoff and Graeme Swann.

England’s best Twenty20 days (Australia at Southampton 2005, New Zealand home and away last year) have been based on aggressive wicket-taking opening bowling spells and Strauss’ men might have to bank on this tactic in June.

The wickets at Lord’s, the Oval and Trent Bridge might have some life in them, suiting James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Flintoff. It isn’t much of a plan, but it’s all England have got at the moment.

4 comments:

Richard Lake said...

Ian Bell showed last year that playing properly can score quickly in 2020. Therefore surely if Strauss has to play he has to take a leaf out of that book rather than looking to improvise from ball 1.

I though the openers looked a decent pair, but from then on, not one of the batsmen seemed to realise that they had to bat out the overs.

Also, how has KP got so much money for playing a game he clearly doesn't like and isn't comfortable with? He and Owais Shah (another IPL player) brought any momentum to a grinding halt. They have a lot of learning to do in India for England to benefit from their time away.

Anonymous said...

I think that Prior's main downfall was the fact that Davies is used to keeping against Batty who was the prefered spinner.
However, the performance was poor and strauss at 6 and amjad khan playing showed real confusion in the English camp.

Rob said...

I too am puzzled by KP's price -- he has never looked at all comfortable at the crease. He is like Salvador Dali being asked to do Rolf Harris's show.

Anonymous said...

Shop smart for the best car deals online. When you are shopping for a car online beware of fraudulent vehicle sales. Use trusted car buying sites like eBay Motors. Don't pay for a vehicle online using a wire service. Get more tips to protect yourself and your money.Engine Coolant Is A Year Round Concern so make sure you check your car's coolant levels on a regular basis. Antifreeze/coolant keeps your engine's cooling system from boiling over in the heat and freezing in the cold.Underground Racing is all about speed and supercars. Find out more about this Charlotte, NC based tuner shop that specializes in custom-built turbocharing and supercharging systems.
Isuzu NPR Truck Power Steering Gearbox