Wednesday, 26 November 2008

Time to trust Shah

While England have been getting routinely thrashed on their travels through India, there has been one ray of solace. Owais Shah, for so long underperforming and untrusted, has most certainly come of age. At 30, he is sure of himself and his game; in Kevin Pietersen, he appears to have found a captain who trusts him, even if it is bewildering that Shah continues to be up and down the order, from six to three, and back again.

The statistics for Shah of late are exceptional. Since the start of the English summer, he has played 13 innings, and scored 514 runs at an average of 47 and a strike-rate of 97. With his ability to manouevre the ball into gaps aided by his phenomenal hitting down the ground, the product of supreme batspeed, Shah has established himself as one of England's two best one-day batsmen, probably second only to his skipper Kevin Pietersen.

Pietersen showed great faith in Shah and promoted him to number three for the home series with South Africa. Many felt he was better off lower down the order, where his unorthodoxy and power hitting has proved so effective, but Shah hasn't exactly failed at three during this time, averaging over 40 in six innings. However, perhaps tellingly, his two best innings at three were in much-reduced matches, suggesting he is better when he knows exactly what is required of him. The argument does not completely hold up, though, given he has batted in the top three for Middlesex for years.

Clearly, England are confused over his best position. In the second game of this series, Shah made a somewhat slow 58 batting at three. He was promptly moved back down to six, scoring a useful 40 at nigh-on a run-a-ball. In game four, with England having only 22 overs to bat, many were mystified when Pietersen moved down from three, and Shah back up there. But Shah is probably England's best Twenty20 batsman, and proved as much with a fantastic 72 from 48 balls, treating the spinners and seamers with disdain, especially with his trademark flat-batted straight drive. Had he taken England home with a century, as seemed possible, Shah would have been a hero, but he nonetheless reminded all of his limited-overs skills. So it seemed bizarre when he was moved back down to six for the fifth game in the series. He seemed unflustered, however, providing England's innings with late-order impetus en route to 66*.

England seem convinced that Shah must bat at either three or six. But this seems ridiculous. Pietersen, as England's skipper and best batsman, should bat at three. Shah, not the out-of-form Paul Collingwood, should bat at four, where his dexterity against spin and at the end of the innings can be exploited, and he can be shielded from perceived weaknesses against the new seaming ball.

Owais Shah is playing the best cricket of his career. England seemed in danger of squandering a fine, albeit sometimes infuriating talent; after scoring 88 and 38 on Test debut in India two years ago, he played only three ODIs in the next fourteen months. Most bewilderingly of all, Ravi Bopara, then with just one ODI 50 to his name, was preferred to Shah for the series in Sri Lanka a year ago. England can't keep having Shah as their spare batsman. He is in form, knows the conditions and deserves a run in the Test side at last.

Through sheer force of runs, Shah has established himself as an indispensable member of England's one-day side, one of the very few players able to take the game with conviction to the opposition. Paul Collingwood may have struck a brilliant, career-saving hundred only two Tests ago. But, given their vastly contrasting form, who would India rather bowl to in the Tests?


Rob said...

They will pick Captain Block over Shah, its a given (and a shame).

Richard Lake said...

They seem to have decided that Shah is at his best with around 20 overs to go in the innings and his moving around the order seems to have been for these purposes.

With Bopara opening with Bell/Cook and KP at 3, despite the results, England have the best top order they have had in a long time. I'd be tempted to give Patel a go at batting 4, as he seems more able to tick along than Colly, who looked woefully out of form today.

With Flintoff, Shah and Prior at 5,6 and 7 it means that we should be able to play with 5 bowlers, rather than having a specialist batsman wasted at 8.

Brian Carpenter said...

Totally agree, and I've said as much on my blog.

Would love to see him play in the Tests (if they happen) but am very doubtful - the cosy old closed shop will probably hold sway

Nick Gammons said...

Excellent stuff, Tim. I totally agree that Shah is not only a superb one-day player, but worthy of a decent run in the Test team. I would have him in at four with Bopara at five, Pietersen at three, Bell opening and say goodbye to Strauss and Collingwood for good.

However, that's never going to happen and England will waste another opportunity to build for the Ashes next summer.

Chrispy said...

We have been in agreement for years Tim that Shah should bat at four with KP three it seems and yet it is still yet to materialise! Whenever they move KP to three Shah for some reason disappears to number six. Who knows what they are playing at. He should be thankful though that he hasn't be dropped for his excellent form. That is usually the English way of treating outsiders. Prehaps he is forcing his way in unlike Mascarenhas.

What is certain is that Collingwood should never ever bat at number four in ODI's as he averages just 22.70 there from 13 matches and that includes four against Bangladesh! Time and again five. Six has proven to be his best position. And Flintoff shouldn't be batting too early which number five encourages. You want some hitting in reserve and Flintoff at 6 with Masca 8 gives plenty of ooomph later on in the innings with KP and Shah taking advantage at the start.

Philip Oliver said...

Shah plays like a man intent on grasping his opportunity - contrast with Bell, who might just have taken selection for granted. A break should see him come back stronger, although as this blog's biggest Ravi Bopara fan, I hope he doesn't!
Shah deserves a run in the Test team more than Strauss, Bell or Collingwood do, but I also fear it won't happen.

Tim said...

Thanks for the comments guys.

I like Flintoff at 5 in the ODI team, it's where he's played most his best innings. and, unlike Dimi, he tends to need a few overs to play himself in.

Shah's in the form of his life and should be picked now - not later, if someone else fails.

Bell opening? Very interesting idea.

Anonymous said...

Utter garbage.

Anonymous said...

Shop smart for the best car deals online. When you are shopping for a car online beware of fraudulent vehicle sales. Use trusted car buying sites like eBay Motors. Don't pay for a vehicle online using a wire service. Get more tips to protect yourself and your money.Engine Coolant Is A Year Round Concern so make sure you check your car's coolant levels on a regular basis. Antifreeze/coolant keeps your engine's cooling system from boiling over in the heat and freezing in the cold.Underground Racing is all about speed and supercars. Find out more about this Charlotte, NC based tuner shop that specializes in custom-built turbocharing and supercharging systems.

Mercedes Benz 230SL Power Steering Gearbox